Skip to main content

Mitchell Hamline Law Review

Volume 43, Issue 1 (2017)

Articles

Why Are the Twin Cities So Segregated?
Myron Orfield and Will Stancil

Blowing Past Minnesota Nice: New Opportunities Arise to Utilize Disparate-Impact Theory and Practice in Twin Cities Low-Income Housing Discrimination Litigation
Anne M. Robertson

Toward Systemic Equality: Reinvigorating a Progressive Application of the Disparate Impact Doctrine
Justin D. Cummins and Beth Belle Isle

Notes

Criminal Law: The System is Rigged: Criminal Restitution Is Blind to the Victim's Fault—State v. Riggs
Ryan Anderson

Civil Procedure: Notifying Justice: "Reasonable Actual Notice" in Service of Process—DeCook v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc.
Paul Fling

Property: A Missed Opportunity: Minnesota Supreme Court Shies Away from Clarifying the Discovery Rule to Toll the Statute of Limitations in Construction-Defect Litigation—328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Property Group, LLC
Sonali Garg

Torts: No Statutory Interpretation Required—Guzick v. Kimball
Marcus Jardine

Constitutional Law: If These Walls Could Talk: Giving Undue Deference to Religious Actors by Expanding the Ecclesiastical Abstention Doctrine—Pfeil v. St. Matthews Evangelical Lutheran Church of Unaltered Augsburg Confession
Jeremy D.F. Krahn

Board of Editors

Editor-In-Chief: Elizabeth M. C. Scheibel
Executive Editors: Jennifer Anderson; Diane Galatowitsch; Joe McGrath; Kirsten Pagel
Symposium Editor: Joey Balthazor
Online Editor: David Stern
Notes and Comments Editor: Christian Barnes
Managing Editors: Kenzie Corrow; Jason Decker; Alex Halverson; Noah Johnson; Aaron Meland; Megan Odom; Krista Rissman