William Mitchell Law Review
Volume 35, Issue 4 (2009)
Prefatory Matter
Opening Remarks
Eric J. Magnuson
Articles
Admissibility of E-evidence in Minnesota: New Problems or Evidence as Usual?
Keiko L. Sugisaka and David F. Herr
Is Death Different? Dying Declarations and the Confrontation Clause after Crawford
Stephen J. Cribari
It's Just a Shot Away: MMR Vaccines and Autism and the End of the Daubertista Revolution
Joelle Anne Moreno
Twenty-five Years of Doing Minnesota Justice
Harriet Lansing
Suggestions from the Bench: Things Judges Wish That Appellate Lawyers Would Do Differently
Bruce D. Willis
Suggestions from the Practicing Bar: Things Practitioners Wish the Court of Appeals Would Do Differently
David F. Herr and Haley N. Schaffer
The Practical Impact of the Court of Appeals: A Panel Discussion
Marianne Short, Bradford Colbert, John Gallus, and Cathy Gorlin
Spreigl Evidence: Still Searching for a Principled Rule
Ted Sampsell-Jones
My Lawyer Told Me to Say I'm Sorry: Lawyers, Doctors, and Medical Apologies
Lucinda E. Jesson and Peter B. Knapp
Significant Weight: The Impact of the Minnesota Court of Appeals upon Civil Litigation
Richard L. Pemberton and Paul S. Almen
Editors
- Editor-in-Chief
- Katherine L. Johansen
- Executive Editors
- Robert Ambrose
- Leah Ceee O. Boomsma
- Shelby G. Miller
- Shira T. Shapiro
- Editors
- Margaret L. Evavold
- James T. Graves
- Mara N. Koeller
- Christina M. Mann
- Jaclyn S. Millner
- Kathryn A. Steen
- Stephanie E. Tulgren
- Margaret J. Tracy
- Assistant Editors
- Emily J. Bucher
- Autumn Capelle
- Brian Carter-Stiglitz
- Steven M. Cerny
- Debra Y. Hamilton
- Shubha M. Harris
- Denise E. Heinemeyer
- Christine E. Hinrichs
- Randolph Lasota II
- Marc J. Laurent
- Adam P. Malamen
- Evans M. Mburu
- Adine S. Momoh
- John J. Norton
- Annie E. Penny
- Matthew G. Plowman
- Katherine S. Rodenwald
- Robert H. Salisbury
- Evangeline Simmons
- Sonia Toomey
- Laura J. Wanger