Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2024
Publication Information
16 ConLawNOW 1 (2024)
Abstract
Scholars increasingly portray the Supreme Court as power hungry and self-aggrandizing. This aggrandizement literature, though, lacks a robust causal theory. This essay argues that judicial aggrandizement is not the product of a power-maximizing agenda but a function of judicial preferences and legal background conditions. Aggrandizement occurs in cases where legal background conditions do not align with judicial policy preferences and the justices assert power to create their preferred policy outcomes. This theory has significant prescriptive and normative implications. For example, counterintuitively, this essay shows that more judicial aggrandizement could be a sign of a healthier institution under some conditions.
Repository Citation
Marisam, Jason, "Judicial Preferences and Aggrandizement Effects" (2024). Faculty Scholarship. 602.
https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/facsch/602