Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2006
Publication Information
68:3 Bench and Bar of Minnesota 26 (2006)
Abstract
A recent, unreported opinion of the Minnesota Court of Appeals has opened up a major hole in the liability shield of professional firms. Continental Casualty Co. v Duckson-Carlson, LLC, misapplies the doctrine of equitable estoppel, misinterprets the Minnesota Professional Firms Act, ignores the fundamental distinction between an entity and its owners, and sub silentio turns the law of third party beneficiaries on its head. From a practical perspective, the decision should trouble every lawyer, doctor, accountant, and other "319B" professional in the state and, moreover, has serious implications for individuals covered by D&O insurance
Repository Citation
Kleinberger, Daniel S., "A Crack in the Shield? Malpractice Coverage at Risk" (2006). Faculty Scholarship. 220.
https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/facsch/220