In re O.R. v. J.R., No. E034376, 2004 WL 585583 (Cal. App. Mar. 25, 2004)

Authors

James Coben, Mitchell Hamline School of LawFollow

Subject Area

Enforcement

Document Type

Video

Publication Date

2006

Comments

Play time: 3:51 minutes

Affirming a visitation order based on the parties' mediated agreement despite fact that father called the mediator and had the agreement reached in mediation changed without the mother's knowledge or consent, determining that the mother's claims of extrinsic fraud and mistake lacked merit because she would have discovered the change if she had chosen to carefully review the agreement before it was signed and subsequently approved by the court.

Recommended Citation

Coben, James, "In re O.R. v. J.R., No. E034376, 2004 WL 585583 (Cal. App. Mar. 25, 2004)" (2006). Mediation Case Law Teaching Videos. 14.
https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/dri_mclvideo/14