William Mitchell Law Review
Article Title
Publication Information
31 William Mitchell Law Review 1397 (2004-2005)
Abstract
This note first discusses the Minnesota Supreme Court’s use of the Minnesota Constitution to provide broader protections for its citizens in the area of Fourth Amendment search and seizure law. This note then explains the rationale for the Minnesota Supreme Court’s decision in Askerooth. Finally, this note discusses the Atwater decision and whether it was necessary for the Minnesota Supreme Court to decide Askerooth under the state constitution.
Recommended Citation
Carlson, Jodie
(2005)
"State v. Askerooth: Re-Applying the Terry Principle of Reasonableness to Traffic Stops Under the Minnesota Constitution,"
William Mitchell Law Review: Vol. 31:
Iss.
4, Article 3.
Available at:
https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr/vol31/iss4/3
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Transportation Law Commons