Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2010
Publication Information
23 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 103 (2010)
Reprinted with permission of the publisher, Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics ©2010
Abstract
This Article argues that the construction of cardboard clients in legal ethics has disserved legal ethics by obscuring what is arguably a more central problem of legal professionalism: the problem of legal objectification. The problem of legal objectification is the tendency of lawyers to "issue-spot" their clients as they would the facts on a blue-book exam, overemphasizing the clients' legal interests and minimizing or ignoring the other cares, commitments, relationships, reputations and values that constitute the objectives clients bring to legal representation. This Article proposes an alternative ideal of legal professionalism for "three-dimensional clients" based on helping clients articulate and actualize their values through the law. It argues that a client value-based model of representation survives the critiques of early legal ethicists and provides an antidote against both the self-seeking behavior that legal objectification promotes and the danger of moral overreaching associated with the lawyer-statesman model.
Repository Citation
Kruse, Kate, "Beyond Cardboard Clients in Legal Ethics" (2010). Faculty Scholarship. 321.
https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/facsch/321