Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2003

Publication Information

29 William Mitchell Law Review 1083 (2003)

Abstract

Minnesota’s sex offender commitment scheme is not just a bad idea; it likely has bad consequences. It is a huge and disproportionate sink for resources that ight be put to more effective use in the fight against sexual violence. Worse, its demand for resources will continue to grow, thus predetermining to a large extent how prevention and treatment dollars are spent. It is very possible that a more rational allocation of these resources would actually prevent more violence than the allocation that is automatically produced by the sex offender commitment scheme. At the very least, the fight against sexual violence demands a full, careful, and empirically-based study of the optimal approach to sexual violence.

Share

COinS