Kakani v. Oracle Corp., No. C 06-06493 WHA, 2007 WL 1793774 (N.D. Cal., June 19, 2007)

Authors

James Coben, Mitchell Hamline School of LawFollow

Subject Area

Enforcement

Document Type

Video

Publication Date

2007

Comments

Play time: 1:43 minutes

Denying joint motion to preliminarily approve proposed class action settlement and specifically rejecting assertion that involvement of a mediator helps prove lack of collusion.

Quote from the Court: "It is also no answer to say that a private mediator helped frame the proposal. Such a mediator is paid to help the immediate parties reach a deal. Mediators do not adjudicate the merits. They are masters in the art of what is negotiable. It matters little to the mediator whether a deal is collusive as long as a deal is reached. Such a mediator has no fiduciary duty to anyone, much less those not at the table. Plaintiffs' counsel has the fiduciary duty. It cannot be delegated to a private mediator."

Recommended Citation

Coben, James, "Kakani v. Oracle Corp., No. C 06-06493 WHA, 2007 WL 1793774 (N.D. Cal., June 19, 2007)" (2007). Mediation Case Law Teaching Videos. 36.
https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/dri_mclvideo/36